|
End-period
|
CNY/ USD
|
CNY/ EUR |
CNY per
JPY100
|
CNY/ HKD
|
CNY/ GBP |
|
1969
|
2.46
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
1970
|
2.46
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
1971
|
2.46
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
1972
|
2.25
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
1973
|
1.99
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
1974
|
1.96
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
1975
|
1.86
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
1976
|
1.94
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
1977
|
1.86
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
1978
|
1.68
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
1979
|
1.56
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
1980
|
1.50
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
1981
|
1.70
|
-
|
0.7735 |
0.3041 |
|
|
1982
|
1.89
|
-
|
0.7607 |
0.3115
|
|
|
1983
|
1.98
|
-
|
0.8318 |
0.2736 |
|
|
1984
|
2.32
|
-
|
0.9780 |
0.2971 |
|
|
1985
|
2.9366
|
-
|
1.2457 |
0.3757 |
|
|
1986
|
3.4528
|
-
|
2.0694 |
0.4422 |
|
|
1987
|
3.7221
|
-
|
2.5799
|
0.4774 |
|
|
1988
|
3.7221
|
-
|
2.9082 |
0.4828 |
|
|
1989
|
3.7651
|
-
|
2.7360 |
0.6139 |
|
|
1990
|
4.7832
|
-
|
3.3233 |
0.6845 |
|
|
1991
|
5.3233
|
-
|
3.9602 |
0.7124
|
|
|
1992
|
5.5146
|
-
|
4.3608 |
0.7441 |
|
|
1993
|
5.7620
|
-
|
5.2020
|
1.1153 |
|
|
1994
|
8.6212
|
-
|
8.5130
|
1.0919
|
|
|
1995
|
8.3490
|
-
|
8.0703
|
1.0760
|
|
|
1996
|
8.3143
|
-
|
7.1633
|
1.0719
|
|
|
1997
|
8.2897
|
-
|
6.3627
|
1.0681
|
|
|
1998
|
8.2791
|
-
|
7.1919
|
1.0678
|
|
|
1999
|
8.2783
|
-
|
8.0933
|
1.0651
|
|
| 2000
|
8.2783
|
-
|
7.2422
|
1.0606
|
|
| 2001
|
8.2770
|
-
|
6.3005
|
1.0606
|
|
| 2002
|
8.2770
|
8.6360
|
6.9035
|
1.0611
|
|
| 2003
|
8.2770
|
10.3383
|
7.7263
|
1.0657
|
|
| 2004
|
8.2765
|
11.2627
|
7.9701
|
1.0637
|
|
| Jan
2004
|
8.2770
|
10.3201
|
7.8068
|
1.0649
|
|
| Feb
2004
|
8.2771
|
10.3539
|
7.6010
|
1.0634
|
|
| Mar
2004
|
8.2771
|
10.0865
|
7.8383
|
1.0614
|
|
| Apr
2004
|
8.2770
|
9.7880
|
7.5031
|
1.0608
|
|
| May
2004
|
8.2769
|
10.1584
|
7.4789
|
1.0616
|
|
| Jun
2004
|
8.2766
|
10.0738
|
7.6367
|
1.0609
|
|
| Jul
2004
|
8.2769
|
9.9834
|
7.4098
|
1.0608
|
|
| Aug
2004
|
8.2767
|
9.9313
|
7.5090
|
1.0607
|
|
| Sep
2004
|
8.2766
|
10.1970
|
7.4519
|
1.6110
|
|
| Oct
2004
|
8.2765
|
10.5254
|
7.7859
|
1.0638
|
|
| Nov
2004
|
8.2765
|
10.9764
|
8.0372
|
1.0640
|
|
| Dec
2004
|
8.2765
|
11.2627
|
7.9701
|
1.0637
|
|
| Jan
2005
|
8.2765
|
10.7833
|
8.0188
|
1.0609
|
|
|
Feb 2005 |
8.2765 |
10.9208 |
7.8503 |
1.0607 |
|
|
Mar 2005 |
8.2765 |
10.7180 |
7.7231 |
1.0608 |
|
|
Apr 2005 |
8.2765 |
10.6855 |
7.8489 |
1.0611 |
|
|
May 2005 |
8.2765 |
10.3722 |
7.6696 |
1.0636 |
|
|
Jun 2005 |
8.2765 |
9.9610 |
7.5149 |
1.0649 |
|
|
Jul 2005 |
8.1080 |
9.7778 |
7.1980 |
1.0422 |
|
|
Aug 2005 |
8.0973 |
9.8870 |
7.2970 |
1.0418 |
|
|
Sep 2005 |
8.0930 |
9.7593 |
7.1656 |
1.0430 |
|
|
Oct 2005 |
8.0840 |
9.8256 |
7.0197 |
1.0425 |
|
|
Nov 2005 |
8.0796 |
9.5453 |
6.7866 |
1.0416 |
|
|
Dec 2005 |
8.0702 |
9.5797 |
6.8716 |
1.0403 |
|
|
Jan 2006 |
8.0608 |
9.8447 |
6.9388 |
1.0394 |
|
|
Feb 2006 |
8.0415 |
9.5188 |
6.9168 |
1.0365 |
|
|
Mar 2006 |
8.0170 |
9.7507 |
6.8265 |
1.0331 |
|
|
Apr 2006 |
8.0165 |
10.0520 |
7.0197 |
1.0339 |
|
|
May 2006 |
8.0188 |
10.3016 |
7.1437 |
1.0350 |
|
|
Jun 2006 |
7.9956 |
10.1313 |
6.9467 |
1.0294 |
|
|
Jul 2006 |
7.9732 |
10.1699 |
6.9477 |
1.0259 |
|
|
Aug 2006 |
7.9585 |
10.2137 |
6.7894 |
1.02334 |
15.1619 |
|
Sep 2006 |
7.9087 |
10.0556 |
6.7274 |
1.01541 |
14.8409 |
|
Oct 2006 |
7.8792 |
10.0168 |
6.6983 |
1.01335 |
14.9681 |
|
Nov 2006 |
7.8436 |
10.3137 |
6.7373 |
1.00872 |
15.2629 |
|
Dec 2006 |
7.8087 |
10.2665 |
6.563 |
1.00467 |
15.3232 |
|
Jan 2007 |
7.7776 |
10.0798 |
6.3924 |
0.9962 |
15.2652 |
|
Feb 2007 |
7.7409 |
10.2366 |
6.5363 |
0.99072 |
15.1931 |
|
Mar 2007 |
7.7342 |
10.3068 |
6.5539 |
0.98993 |
15.1800 |
|
Apr 2007 |
7.7055 |
10.4999 |
6.4441 |
0.98518 |
15.3678 |
|
Jun 2007 |
7.6155 |
10.2337 |
6.1824 |
0.97436 |
15.2455 |
|
Jul 2007 |
7.5737 |
10.3839 |
6.3693 |
0.96805 |
15.3845 |
|
Aug 2007 |
7.5607 |
10.3321 |
6.5184 |
0.96985 |
15.2227 |
|
Sep 2007 |
7.5108 |
10.6312 |
6.5091 |
0.96834 |
15.2368 |
|
Oct 2007 |
7.4692 |
10.7829 |
6.5094 |
0.96375 |
15.4534 |
|
Nov 2007 |
7.3997 |
10.9275 |
6.7242 |
0.95009 |
15.2811 |
|
Dec 2007 |
7.3046 |
10.6669 |
6.4064 |
0.93638 |
14.5807 |
|
Jan 2008 |
7.1853 |
10.6612 |
6.756 |
0.92102 |
14.2707 |
|
Feb 2008 |
7.1058 |
10.7809 |
6.7858 |
0.91353 |
14.1231 |
|
Mar 2008 |
7.0191 |
11.0809 |
7.0204 |
0.90194 |
14.0219 |
|
Apr 2008 |
7.0002 |
10.8972 |
6.7229 |
0.89833 |
13.7813 |
|
May 2008 |
6.9472 |
10.7772 |
6.5716 |
0.89026 |
13.7252 |
|
Jun 2008 |
6.8591 |
10.8302 |
6.446 |
0.87917 |
13.6836 |
|
Jul 2008 |
6.8388 |
10.6531 |
6.3255 |
0.87647 |
13.5326 |
|
Aug 2008 |
6.8345
|
10.0522 |
6.2527 |
0.87532 |
12.5065 |
|
Sep 2008 |
6.8183
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 2008 |
6.8258
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 2008 |
6.8349
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 2008 |
6.8346
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 2009 |
6.8380
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 2009 |
6.8379
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 2009 |
6.8359
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 2009 |
6.8250
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2009 |
6.8324
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 2009 |
6.8319
|
9.6408
|
7.1117
|
0.88153
|
11.3379
|
|
Jul 2009 |
6.8323
|
9.6250
|
7.1580
|
0.88158
|
11.2781
|
|
Aug 2009 |
6.8312
|
9.7727
|
7.3537
|
0.88133
|
11.1294
|
|
Sep 2009 |
6.8290
|
9.9659
|
7.5747
|
0.88114
|
10.9090
|
|
Oct 2009 |
6.8281
|
10.1288
|
7.4763
|
0.88102
|
11.2985
|
|
Nov 2009 |
6.8272
|
10.2350
|
7.8800
|
0.88091
|
11.2700
|
|
Dec 2009 |
6.8282
|
9.7971
|
7.3782
|
0.88048
|
10.978
|
|
Jan 2010 |
6.8270
|
9.5049
|
7.6075
|
0.87799
|
11.0432
|
|
Feb 2010 |
6.8269
|
9.2545
|
7.6376
|
0.8793
|
10.4158
|
|
Mar 2010 |
6.8266
|
9.1588
|
7.3421
|
0.87922
|
10.2978
|
|
Apr 2010 |
6.8263
|
9.0380
|
7.2640
|
0.87905
|
10.4674
|
|
May 2010 |
6.8280
|
8.4015
|
7.4733
|
0.87659
|
9.8576
|
|
Jun 2010 |
6.7909
|
8.2710
|
7.6686
|
0.87239
|
10.2135
|
|
Jul 2010 |
6.775 |
8.8441 |
7.8256 |
0.87236 |
10.5741 |
|
Aug 2010 |
6.8105 |
8.6085 |
8.0545 |
0.87528 |
10.5287 |
|
Sep 2010 |
6.7011 |
9.1329 |
7.9999 |
0.86349 |
10.6018 |
|
Oct 2010 |
6.6908 |
9.3116 |
8.2648 |
0.86256 |
10.6702 |
|
Nov 2010 |
6.6762 |
8.7645 |
7.929 |
0.85979 |
10.3902 |
|
Dec 2010 |
6.6227 |
8.8065 |
8.126 |
0.85093 |
10.2182 |
|
Jan 2011 |
6.5891 |
8.9552 |
8.0223 |
0.8456 |
10.4371 |
|
Feb 2011 |
6.5752 |
9.0205 |
8.046 |
0.84363 |
10.5749 |
|
Mar 2011 |
6.5564 |
9.2681 |
7.8883 |
0.84225 |
10.5535 |
|
Apr 2011 |
6.499 |
9.6348 |
7.9718 |
0.83639 |
10.813 |
|
May 2011 |
6.4845 |
9.3215 |
8.0214 |
0.83368 |
10.713 |
|
Jun 2011 |
6.4716 |
9.3612 |
8.0243 |
0.83162 |
10.3986 |
|
Jul 2011 |
6.4442 |
9.2233 |
8.2846 |
0.82696 |
10.5382 |
|
Aug 2011 |
6.3867 |
9.2122 |
8.3296 |
0.81923 |
10.4177 |
|
Sep 2011 |
6.3549 |
8.6328 |
8.2978 |
0.81539 |
9.927 |
|
Oct 2011 |
6.3233 |
8.9465 |
8.352 |
0.81441 |
10.1887 |
|
Renminbi: from fix to float? Eventually,
but not just yet.
China's exchange rate policy is constantly under the microscope in the
country's trade and investment partners. However, much of the criticism
of the Chinese government's exchange rate policies seems to be based on
the assumption that these have been dreamed up overnight.
In fact, the key principle underlying
these policies is the desire for exchange rate stability.
Understanding how and why China's exchange
rates have moved in recent decades is important for a general
understanding of China's economy and also helps those engaged in
competitive trading in the
forex trading market.
Before the 1980s, the exchange rate of the renminbi was artificially
fixed at just under 2.5 to the dollar. This rate did not reflect
purchasing power parities, but as foreign trade
played such a small part in China's economy that didn't matter much.
As the economy was opened to international trade in the 1980s, downward
pressure on the currency emerged. By 1985, the current account was in
deficit, while inward
FDI flows remained relatively small.
Small devaluations from 1984 onward were insufficient to prevent the
development of a black market in which the exchange rate was much lower.
Meanwhile, foreigners visiting China were issued with a separate
currency, "foreign exchange certificates" (FECs), which enjoyed only a
limited circulation. Organisations, including foreign-invested
enterprises, using large amounts of foreign currency were allowed to
conduct limited transactions in "swap centres", where the exchange rate
was lower than the official fixed rate.
In 1994, the currency was effectively devalued when the official and
swap rates were unified. Since then, the renminbi has appreciated, then
stabilised, as the current account has moved into
comfortable surplus and FDI inflows
have settled at a high level. The authorities are
moving gradually towards a less rigidly-controlled exchange rate, with
fluctuations allowed within a wider band, but a full float is unlikely
in the near future.
On 21 July 2005 the peg against the US
dollar was replaced by a link to a basket of currencies, but the
exchange rate was simultaneously set within a narrow band around
Rmb8.11:US$1, representing a far smaller appreciation than had been
called for by the United States and other trading partners.
The four main currencies in the basket
are the US dollar, the euro, the Japanese yen and the Korean won.
|
In the following three years, however,
a further gentle appreciation against the US currency has occurred. By
end-October 2008, the renminbi had risen to nearly 6.8 to the US dollar, significantly
stronger than the Hong Kong dollar (which is fixed at HKD7.8:USD1 and
has consequently come under upward pressure).
Since mid-2008, the renminbi has
been held stable as the Chinese government considers how best to respond
to the global economic crisis.
|
|
|
|
In June 2010, the temporary dollar peg
was again abandoned, after the renminbi had risen some 16% against the
euro following the onset of the Greek fiscal crisis. However, the
Chinese government has signalled that its currency will only be allowed
to appreciate gradually against the dollar.
 
|